Will you be my friend?

by Jeffrey Veen 29 Mar 2004 · 3 minute read

Have you clicked “no” yet? You know, you get that email that says so-and-so has asked to be your friend at yet-another-social-networking-site.com, you jump over there, and realize you don’t really know this person. Maybe they’re a friend of a friend you’ve never heard of, or a link-status junkie trolling for new friends. Do you let your ego take over and bump your social network up a point or two? Or do you turn your back on this stranger, the digital equivalent of averting your eyes when someone you don’t know smiles at a party.

Sure, you’re my friend. But so what? What possible value is there in codifying my connections to others? I get a nostalgic kick out of seeing who signed my high school year book, but that’s about it. And now aren’t we doing the same thing online?

I found a glimmer of hope for social networks recently when I stumbled across this procmail script. It’s a whitelist generator based on your Orkut network. That is, the script scrapes your list of friends at that site (violating the TOS of course) and uses what it finds to poke holes in your spam filters. So if you’re my friend, your email will always get to me, regardless of what your put in it.

What else should my friend-list do for me? Matt Haughey braindumped a bunch of scenarios in an essay a few months ago. Collaborative driving directions, group media recommendations – all good stuff. I’d like:

You see? It’s the applications that are interesting, not the infrastructure. And Orcut, Friendster, and Tribe.net are all just infrastructure. They’re big databases full of relationships, but very little else. On top of that, the standards are all in place. It’s as if these big repositories of data are being handed free APIs: FOAF, iCal, vCard, et al.

The interesting thing is that the social network sites own the contract between you and your so-called-friends. Sure, I can publish a FOAF document saying I know Bill, Tim, and Oprah. But that’s meaningless, of course, unless Tim, Bill, and Oprah also agree. It’s services like Orkut that aggregate these agreements.

For example, when I plan a trip, I try to find out who else will be around so I have people to hang out with. So my calendar should ask Upcoming.org, “Hey, Jeff says he’s friends with Tim. Will he be in New York for GEL?”

Ongoing should say, “Well, let me check. Hey Orkut, are Tim and Jeff friends?”

And Orkut should reply, “Yeah, Tim says he knows Jeff. Go ahead and give him access to Tim’s travel calendar. Oh, and here’s the email address Tim actually reads.”

Now, hook up the same pipes to AudioScrobbler, del.icio.us, Mailblocks, BlogRolling, and any other site that connect me to others. This, by the way, is more or less what Amazon, Verisign, and your Web browsing software all do when you type in your credit card data. Two distinct parties ask a trusted third-party to validate a relationship.

Sure, it’s a lot of work – I’ve worked on committees developing standards before. It’s very, very difficult to get the kids to play together. But the pieces are all there. And the first one to connect the dots will win…